No messages yet
Click "Get Started" to begin receiving emails from your team.
Click "Get Started" to begin receiving emails from your team.
Take charge of an internal venture at Neptune Corporation. Your mission: build Neptune's next billion-dollar brand in just 12 months. Balance purpose, people, and profit as you scale the business to new markets.
Expand into new markets and build momentum
Stay true to the mission while chasing growth
Build your team and shape culture through decisions
Click any topic to learn more about the game
You can revisit this from the title screen anytime
Content goes here
The lift doors open onto the 23rd floor. Your floor now.
After eight years building your reputation across Neptune Corporation — from operations to strategy to leading a regional product team — the call finally came. You've been appointed New Business Unit Director of one of the company's most ambitious internal ventures: a startup-within-a-corporation that could reshape how millions of people live.
The previous director moved on. The board sees potential — and risk. You have 12 months to prove this venture can become Neptune's next billion-dollar brand.
"Neptune has always believed that business should improve lives, not just extract profit. Your venture sits at the heart of that mission.
We need you to reach new markets, build a team that believes in what we're doing, and — critically — prove we can do good and make money. Get this right, and you'll have built Neptune's next billion-dollar brand.
The next year will test everything you know about leadership. Your department heads will bring you problems. Your decisions will shape the culture. And the numbers won't lie.
Good luck. We're counting on you."
Select a venture to lead. Click "Learn More" to see full details before choosing.
Premium personal care refill hubs
Premium plant-based frozen desserts
Affordable hygiene for emerging markets
B2B digital wellness platform
Tagline
How aggressively will you pursue growth? This sets your market targets, timeline, and resource requirements.
Focus on winning a few key markets really well. Build deep customer relationships and perfect your operating model before expanding further. Less pressure, more control.
Expand across multiple regions while maintaining quality. Balance speed with careful execution. The board expects meaningful scale, but you have room to course-correct.
Move fast and capture territory before competitors can respond. High investment, aggressive timelines, significant pressure — but the upside is transformational if you succeed.
Choose how to allocate resources across departments. Standard funding is included in your baseline costs. You can shift resources to prioritise certain areas — increasing one means more impact there, reducing saves money but limits effectiveness.
Financial controls, reporting, cash management
Talent development, culture, compensation
Supply chain, facilities, logistics
Brand building, campaigns, market expansion
R&D, systems, innovation, digital tools
Internal candidates are ready immediately. External hires bring fresh perspectives but have recruitment costs and onboarding time.
Job Title
InternalReview your resource allocations based on what you've learned. Shifting resources to priority areas can improve outcomes.
Loading reflection...
Every playthrough teaches something new about leading corporate ventures.
The research and inspiration behind this simulation
Burgelman, R.A. and Grove, A.S., 2007. Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos—repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), pp.965-979. DOI
DeSantola, A. and Gulati, R., 2017. Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), pp.640-668. DOI
Haas, M.R. and Hansen, M.T., 2007. Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), pp.1133-1153. DOI
Hansen, M.T., 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), pp.82-111. DOI
Sapsed, J. and Salter, A., 2004. Postcards from the edge: Local communities, global programs and boundary objects. Organization Studies, 25(9), pp.1515-1534. DOI
Szulanski, G., 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), pp.27-43. DOI
Szulanski, G., Ringov, D. and Jensen, R.J., 2016. Overcoming stickiness: How the timing of knowledge transfer methods affects transfer difficulty. Organization Science, 27(2), pp.304-322. DOI
Szulanski, G. and Winter, S., 2002. Getting it right the second time. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), pp.62-69.
Winter, S.G. and Szulanski, G., 2001. Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12(6), pp.730-743. DOI
Winter, S.G., Szulanski, G., Ringov, D. and Jensen, R.J., 2012. Reproducing knowledge: Inaccurate replication and failure in franchise organizations. Organization Science, 23(3), pp.672-685. DOI
WeCrashed (AppleTV) — Documents the experience of WeWork in a 10-part series, with excellent acting and rich information about the dangers of hyper-scaling.
The Founder (Movie) — Documents the rise and growth of McDonald's as a franchise model by following the life of Ray Kroc. It also shows the tensions between the original template and its expansion into mass scaling.